It was an act of uncertainty.… The survey team didn’t arrive with banners or slogans this time. They came with microphones. Not to record animals—no one seriously believed a dairy cow or a macaque would articulate consent—but to record humans speaking for them. The project was called Proxy Voices. Funded quietly through a coalition of universities, agri-tech firms, and one uneasy ministry, it emerged after a decade of increasingly visible contradictions in animal welfare policy. On paper, standards had improved worldwide—cage bans, humane slaughter protocols, welfare labeling. Public support was strong. Legislators spoke of “sentience” with newfound confidence. And yet, the disputes had only intensified. At a roundtable in Geneva the year before, one delegate summarized the problem bluntly: “Animals are at the center. But they are the only stakeholders who never speak.” ⸻ Mori, the lead field coordinator, had spent years stu...