The signing ceremony was brief. The cameras flashed, the pens were handed out as souvenirs, and the headline was written before the ink dried: President Trump Ends Paper Straw Mandate, Declares War on ‘Disgusting’ Straws.
It was a scene almost identical to the one that had taken place four years earlier, when President Biden had ordered the phase-out of plastic straws, calling them a symbol of the environmental crisis. Back then, the script was reversed—Biden had stood at the same desk, flanked by officials nodding solemnly as he signed an order heralded as a step toward sustainability. Now, with a flick of his pen, Trump was reversing it, restoring plastic straws to government use and, in his words, “saving Americans from soggy, useless paper alternatives.”
The debate that followed was predictable. Environmental groups decried the reversal, pointing out that plastic straws were just the tip of the iceberg in the fight against pollution. On the other side, supporters hailed Trump’s move as a stand against government overreach, a victory for “freedom of choice” in beverage consumption. But beneath the noise, a quieter question lingered: How much of this was real?
After all, plastic straws made up a minuscule fraction of global plastic waste. Even when Biden had banned them, the government still purchased mountains of plastic cutlery, packaging, and single-use containers. The paper straw mandate had been a symbol, not a solution. Now, its repeal was just as symbolic—one more move in the endless game of political theater.
Somewhere, in the office of a policy analyst buried deep within the bureaucracy, a report sat unread, detailing the real environmental crisis: microplastics invading drinking water, plastic waste suffocating marine life, industries quietly continuing to pump out billions of tons of plastic every year. That report would never make headlines.
But a presidential order about straws? That was something America could debate. That was something people could fight over, could laugh about, could rally behind. That was something they could see.
And so, the cycle continued. The cameras moved on. The next order would come. The next performance would begin.
All names of people and organizations appearing in this story are pseudonyms.
Comments