Skip to main content

How do people who enforce spatially think?

In any case, a companion who finished watching the irrelevant video came and the silly conversation was over.....

Dawn and sunset are very romantic. Do you know why such a moment is romantic? … If the rays from the sun are weakened, the landscape will not be clearly visible. That is, the amount of visible information suddenly decreases. And one cannot think logically. Such a psychological state is called romantic.

people
gender
thinking
types
spatially
temporally

When I heard the above explanation

I had no choice but to nod. To be more precise, I didn’t try to find a reason to argue.
I will admit that the amount of information decreases when it gets dim. But I don’t quite understand the claim that it makes people sentimental.
If anything, the above reasoning merely describes how a particular individual feels. So tackling that challenge will not give us general wisdom.
In the first place, the person who told me the above dawn theory is a man who has nothing to do with the word romantic.

Now, with some controversy over gender

humans are classified as a single independent organism.
I think the reason for the controversy over gender is that the relationship between human form, mind and role is still uncertain.
Aside from the confusing story, I think people are vaguely divided into two types.
When focusing on how people think, there are two series of people. One is those who think spatially, and the other is those who think temporally.
People who do things spatially start thinking from the present. They imagine, hypothesize, and test wider and farther from their current location.

Does the person who thinks in the flow of time seek a place?

Such spatial thinking humans consider spatial expansion to be a prerequisite for living wisely. They read books, talk to people, and experience different things.
Unlike spatial thinking, temporal thinking does not seek its current location. Temporal thinking finds themselves in the flow of time. There is no space in their thoughts, only time.
They also gather information and make hypotheses, but they start from the past or future rather than the present.
Temporal thinking does not recognize the value of the present, but finds value in things that are continuous from the past to the future.
I feel that the two types of thinking styles mentioned above are absolute. It should be called fate.


I was tired from hearing a complicated story, but my head is thinking about something else.
Indeed, if we lived on a planet where the sun never set and the day would last forever, we might have no emotions.
On the contrary, if the sun did not rise and we lived in the dark, I think we would be terribly romantic people.
In any case, a companion who finished watching the irrelevant video came and the silly conversation was over.

That’s all for today’s post. Thank you

Comments