I got a short mail on my cell phone yesterday. The short sentence said: That woman died from being infected with the new coronavirus
She was over 80 years old
She had her two younger brothers. One of them died of tetanus at an early age.
Another younger brother was fine until he was over 60, but one day he suddenly had an intracerebral hemorrhage and a part of his body stopped working.
After his onset, his physiognomy changed due to the negative psychological effects. He was like a different person. And he died without his physical and mental recovery.
She has one older sister left. Her sister is still alive.
My feeling is that I still can’t believe the death from the corona infection.
Why can’t the relationship between the environment and humankind be easily defined?
We can imagine what the environment is relatively easily. It’s, in essence, the sum of the conditions around us.
But can we easily define how we relate to the environment?
Isn’t this a rather difficult task? Because the definition of the environment is actually ambiguous, and we ourselves are just as ambiguous.
Nonetheless, the reason why the way we interact with the environment is relatively easy to introduce into our thoughts and views is that it is sufficient, even if it is ambiguous.
In reality, the gap between the environment and us is set arbitrarily. In the extreme, both the environment and us are arbitrarily defined.
I think this fact is one of the reasons why no final conclusion has been found on environmental issues.
Showing posts matching
Of course, it is wrong to hate the environment. In any environment, we must do our utmost.
But I can’t understand the fragility of a human life. I wonder why people have to get old and die.
What was the significance of the life of a woman who died yesterday from a coronavirus infection?
I can’t understand that people disappear.
During Russian shelling on Friday, …
Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant Fire Extinguished as Russia Continues Attacks | WSJ - YouTube
That’s all for today’s post. Thank you
Comments