“Huh? That’s strange. The numbers you entered are wrong. Let’s check.”
Holding the folder with the check sheet in his hand, he alternately stares at my face and the check sheet. I am the one who filled in the suspicious numbers on the check sheet.
Work results are shared online. So I’m sure I’m not the only one who finds it pointless to have to use a ballpoint pen to write a six-digit number on a paper checklist every day as a routine task.
For at least the past four months, I have not received any kind of remarks about the contents of the check sheet.
So I, no, everyone in this office feels like this: This checklist doesn’t matter.
- What is the pressure exerted during the discussion?
- If you want to decide something by discussion, you should use invisible pressure.
Such pressure has the power to forcefully direct the discussion and transform it into the expected conclusion.
The pressure exerted on the discussion is completely separate from the discussion itself. So, in a way, non-discussion elements dominate the discussion.
“Ah! This is a 4. This is a 4, not a 0. I’m not wrong, am I?”
He noticed that the six-digit number represented less than it did yesterday. Oh! I can’t believe someone read this number carefully!
- Need a discussion?
- But still, we need to talk. Because it provides an opportunity and a place for two or more invisible pressures to collide.
If a work management critical error occurs, it will be detected on the system. Rather, I think that even though the daily work results are shared in the system, they were not considered a problem.
If so, I wonder why we create handwritten check sheets every day.
The yellow folder holding the check sheet is slightly dirty.
Putin concedes China has ‘questions and concerns’ over Russia’s faltering invasion of Ukraine - CNN… Putin made the comments when meeting Chinese leader Xi Jinping in person for the first time since the invasion at a regional summit in Uzbekistan, …
That’s all for today’s post. Thank you
Comments