The man’s phone sat in the middle of his desk, surrounded by the detritus of his life: empty coffee mugs, half-eaten donuts, crumpled tissue paper. The wallpaper was a picture of a smiling toddler, his new son.
The man had remarried last year, after his first wife had divorced him for his violence. He had met his current wife through a dating app for people who had been divorced. They had both been looking for someone who understood what they had been through.
The man’s new wife had a two-year-old son from her previous marriage. The man had quickly bonded with the boy, and they had become very close. The man was determined to be a better father to his son than he had been to his own children.
But the man was also a flawed man. He was still struggling with his anger issues, and he sometimes lashed out at his wife and son. He knew that he needed help, but he was afraid to ask for it. He didn’t want to be labeled as a “violent man” again.
One day, the man’s wife found the phone. She saw the picture of the toddler and the rumors about the man’s violence. She was furious. She confronted the man, and he admitted everything.
The woman was heartbroken. She had thought that the man was different, but she realized that he was just the same as her ex-husband. She left him, taking their son with her.
The man was devastated. He had lost his wife and son, and he knew that he had only himself to blame. He vowed to get help for his anger issues, and he started going to therapy.
It took a lot of hard work, but the man eventually made progress. He learned how to control his anger, and he became a better father to his son. He also found a new wife, who was understanding and supportive.
The man’s story is a reminder that change is possible. Even if you have made mistakes in the past, you can still learn and grow. It is never too late to become a better person.
The relationship between the excluder and the excluded in this story is primarily quantitative. The excluder (the man) has more of something (violence) than the excluded (his wife and son). This creates a gradient or spectrum of exclusion, with the man at one end and his wife and son at the other.
The man’s violence is a qualitative attribute, but it is also measurable. He has been physically violent in the past, and he has a history of anger issues. This makes him a greater risk to his wife and son than someone who has never been violent.
The man’s violence has excluded him from his wife and son. They have left him, and he is now alone. He is trying to change, but it will take time to rebuild their trust.
The story ends with the man hopeful for the future. He is getting help for his anger issues, and he is starting to build a new life for himself. He knows that he has made mistakes, but he is determined to be a better person.
Israel Considers Deporting 1,000 Eritreans Involved In ‘Riots’: PM
Comments