Skip to main content

Good or bad to pursue details?

The New York Times reported that a CIA officer was the source of information leakage

Is it good or bad to pursue the details of things? This action is often viewed negatively, but I would like to say that it is good that the details are pursued by someone. Because most of the essentials do not include the elements that should be pursued.

It is the boss’s job to pursue specific details in order to psychologically pursue his subordinates1

A deal between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is being pursued.2

The allegations of Trump and Ukraine were quickly tagged as “Trump Gate”.3

allegations
whole
pursue
defects
details
essentials
someone

  1. But the problems don’t seem easy. I knew a young office worker. One day he had a gloomy face. how are you? He said he was pursued by his boss. The pursuit is: "Hey, you use a spoon badly when you eat."
    Pursued by his boss, he was depressed. Is the boss’s indication, in this case, an indirect proof that he is essentially average or better? Was the use of the spoon pursued because his essence did not include defects?
    We cannot rule out the possibility that it is not so. In other words, he who was depressed may have been a company employee who was pursued in both essence and detail.
    The word power harassment is prevalent, but it can actually be an indirect retirement encouragement. In that case, the legitimate task of reducing personnel is hidden in the pursuit by bosses. That is not harassment but management. It is the boss’s job to pursue specific details in order to psychologically pursue his subordinates. What if one of the specific tasks pursued how to use a spoon?
    Why Mental Health and Eating Disorders Are So Connected
    10 things not to say to a depressed person (and please don’t …
    How to Hold a Spoon: 12 Steps (with Pictures) - wikiHow ↩︎

  2. The New York Times reported that a CIA officer was the source of information leakage. The CIA officer knows the details of the political situation in Ukraine and Europe and seems to have returned to the CIA.
    White House Knew of Whistle-Blower’s Allegations Soon After …
    Whistleblower works for CIA, detailed to WH for a time: NY Times report
    Ukraine scandal: Trump’s new impeachable offense is threatening the life of a CIA officer ↩︎

  3. The allegations are likely to be linked to distrust within the US Republican Party and instability factors that enter the US presidential election in 2020. However, the essential problem is that details of the talks communicated in the presidential office were stolen by the CIA.
    CIA is not the White House legislative staff. Is such an external organization pursuing details of the administration?
    “Trumpgate” was named because it resembles “Watergate scandal” (1972). In the latter case, Richard Milhous Nixon (January 9, 1913 – April 22, 1994), then president, retired.
    The latest on Trump’s Ukraine drama - CNNPolitics - CNN.com
    Timeline — Central Intelligence Agency
    Watergate scandal - Wikipedia ↩︎

Do not pursue the details.
However, as long as the essence of the whole is composed of details, good is good and bad is bad, even if it is small. Do you think so too? I don’t think so. That’s all for today’s post. Thank you

Comments

Post a Comment