Not only theoretically but also by simplified or symbolized

To avoid the risk or to estimate the outcome, we will test just before we actually do something. It seems that we don’t do anything directly.

북한이 이번 주말 미국과 핵 대화를 재개하겠다고 발표 한 직후, 북한은 일본해를 향한 단거리 미사일 (?) 시험 발사를 실시했다.

I don’t know when we started doing that, but after all, humans think about what to do if they fail, so we should try things out after trying once¹

Immediately after Pyongyang announced that it would resume nuclear talks with the US this weekend, North Korea conducted a test launch of a short-range missile (?) Towards the Sea of ​​Japan²

Means of launching missiles are used to show off military power or to control virtual enemy nations, but it seems that these means have turned into foolish objectives³

---

1. The impacts or outcomes that are revealed by the approach are simulated more than once. Things are not only tried theoretically but also tested by things that have simplified objectives or symbolized mechanisms.
   I don’t know when we started doing that, but after all, humans think about what to do if they fail, so we should try things out after trying once.
   However, it should be noted that although testing before doing things is a sensible way to find risks and improve outcomes, testing should not be successful.
   In other words, when you set up a virtual means of testing for a real purpose, don’t set up a test for testing because you want to make the test “successful”. If the means change to purpose, the means will increase indefinitely and the original purpose will be lost.
   One way to prevent it is to fail the test. You can fail the test because the test was set up to not fail the real task. Try to find the risks and outcomes by failing as easily as possible.
   Chapter 3—Motivational Interviewing as a Counseling Style
   When Evidence Says No, but Doctors Say Yes - The Atlantic
   Does Spinal Manipulation Work? - Pain Science
   Hey, what should I do if I fail on a real challenge? Just think it was a test. ↩︎

2. It was the 9th missile launch since July 25 of this year.
   On October 2, two missiles launched from the Wonsan region of the North ’s Kangwon province fell into the waters between Korea and Japan. One of them invaded the exclusive economic zone. This was the second time since 2017.
   Hours After Agreeing to Resume Talks, North Korea Launches …
   North Korea may have fired missile from submarine - BBC News
   South Korea says North Korea fired a projectile off eastern coast ↩︎

3. Isn’t the missile maker inviting North Korea to test-fire? The reason is that no matter how great the products are made by the manufacturers, the performance of the products is not verified unless they are used in reality. In addition, the selling price will not increase. So, for no reason, missiles must be launched.
   Of course, those who make the missiles are not companies in North Korea. Manufacturers from other countries provide technology to North Korea.
   North Korea: A rising threat — FT.com
   Why North Korea is testing so many weapons - Vox
   North Korea keeps testing missiles, 'playing Trump for a fool ↩︎

I don’t want people to be tested and I don’t want to test people.

But if we don’t test a person, we don’t know that person well. By being tested by someone, a person may encounter himself. Hassle. That’s all for today’s post. Thank you