Skip to main content

What a simple reason!

The staff that fills the niche around the star must be substantial.....

There are two types of ace strikers who can score more.

star
members
support
division
inequality
niche
gathering

Whether it is selected as a representative or not.

Both are ace players. What’s the difference?

In short, the unselected ace waits for the ball to come around.

The selected ace works even when he is not holding the ball.

What a simple reason!

Not limited to sports, there is a star system as a method that organizations often take.

It’s a system that entrusts the decisive work to a small number of outstanding human resources, stars, and the other members support the stars.

This is a division of labor in a good way. In a bad way, disparity.

No one welcomes inequality, but a team of all homogeneouss will not produce high levels of results.

A team that develops each person’s qualities in a positive direction and recognizes members who match the purpose as stars can work efficiently.

However, the organization that adopts the star system must not be reliant on the star.

The staff that fills the niche around the star must be substantial.

When the support that fills the niche works well, the star will be able to perform and improve the performance of the entire team.

If the disparity cannot be admitted and therefore the division of labor is refused, the organization no longer deserves the name of the team.

They are just gathering.

Without Sales or a Real Target Market, Solo Stock Is a Big Gamble | InvestorPlace
Without Sales or a Real Target Market, Solo Stock Is a Big Gamble | InvestorPlace… “purpose-built three-wheeled, all-electric solution for the urban environment.” …

That’s all for today’s post. Thank you

Comments