Skip to main content

Assuming that the information obtained by failure is 100

It is realistic information, that is, information that can not be obtained without experience on the spot. It is not written by people who have never been on the scene, is not reproduced in large quantities by a rotary press, and is not readable by anyone. I have an extra time to post today. Do you know watermelon? It is a watermelon to eat in summer etc. Is that fruit or vegetable? Are you worried about it? I feel that watermelon was sold at the grocery store. Of course, watermelons are also sold at fruit stores. And fruit stores and flower shops are open until late at night, but why is that? Well, that doesn't matter. Watermelon is worth sweetening. Some watermelons are not sweet, but we do not know until we eat it. There is nothing like a meaningless watermelon that is lacking in sweetness. So, do we have to eat to know if it is sweet or not sweet? Not really. Experts may hit the watermelon to judge sweetness. This is a bit strange, isn't it? Impress the watermelon and estimate sweetness by the returning vibration and sound. Sound wave and taste do not matter! However, it seems that a part of the sweetness is reflected in acoustic information. Therefore, it can be judged whether the watermelon is sweet or sweet by beating. Of course, it is not completely accurate, but not completely inaccurate. Although not explained, there is a fact. There is such a measurement method in the world...                                                                                                                             

Sorry I made you wait. Good morning. If the conditions change, the method must also change. If the conditions change, the usual method will not pass and you will be confused. But it is fun too. If you stay in one place and get used to the condition, and you can execute things without being aware of it, there is no discovery. You can not find anything. It is because the same thing will be repeated without knowing what is good or not. So, even a wise person makes a contingency. Pioneers can ignore success rates and try to extract useful information from the remnants of failure. Only such a person can obtain unexpected information and can absorb useful knowledge. That information is not text. It is realistic information, that is, information that can not be obtained without experience on the spot. It is not written by people who have never been on the scene, is not reproduced in large quantities by a rotary press, and is not readable by anyone.

I have an extra time to post today.

Do you know watermelon?

It is a watermelon to eat in summer etc. Is that fruit or vegetable? Are you worried about it? I feel that watermelon was sold at the grocery store. Of course, watermelons are also sold at fruit stores. And fruit stores and flower shops are open until late at night, but why is that? Well, that doesn’t matter.
Watermelon is worth sweetening. Some watermelons are not sweet, but we do not know until we eat it. There is nothing like a meaningless watermelon that is lacking in sweetness.
So, do we have to eat to know if it is sweet or not sweet? Not really. Experts may hit the watermelon to judge sweetness. This is a bit strange, isn’t it? Impress the watermelon and estimate sweetness by the returning vibration and sound. Sound wave and taste do not matter! However, it seems that a part of the sweetness is reflected in acoustic information. Therefore, it can be judged whether the watermelon is sweet or sweet by beating. Of course, it is not completely accurate, but not completely inaccurate. Although not explained, there is a fact. There is such a measurement method in the world.

If you don’t have the time to judge

My theory is that if you want to recognize things, you must fail first. Or destroy it. Useful information can only be obtained from there. So, to check the sweetness of watermelon, do you have to try eating and make sure it is not sweet? Will there be another way before that? I agree. As I mentioned earlier, let’s hit and get fragmentary information. By supplementing the missing information with imagination, we can know the sweetness of watermelon in advance. Assuming that the information obtained by failure is 100, about 25 is not fragmentary information obtained in advance? Missing 75 is imagination or rule of thumb. I think that there is a way to know things like that, but what do you think?

Assuming that the information obtained by failure is 100, about 25 is not fragmentary information obtained in advance?

If you don’t have the time to judge, or if you wish to get information quickly, destroy the nasty things. There is nothing left after destruction, but only information remains. It’s a somewhat rough way. But some people do it.


Yes, I posted something strange today. Truly meaningless. But if you want to get somewhere, first speak, say or write out. If you do not destroy the static state, it is no good. Things don’t go on. The worst thing is that you don’t take action. But I also think that we should not be kind of destructive. Because, in a sense, it is a last resort. Yes, I won’t say anything anymore. goodbye

Comments