Skip to main content

Electronic cigarettes will result in increased sales of analog cigarettes

According to a review considered neutral, if a person who does not know the presence of meat made from soy eats Beyond Meat, he seems to have the impression of "weird meat." It seems to be so similar to real meat.　Well, the benefits of Beyond Meat: This food is 100% plant-based, so no malicious cholesterol is left in the body. I would like everyone to investigate the details, but in short, it seems to be a new food that leaves only the texture of the beef and removes the disadvantages.　But I want you to think a little. If it is such a wonderful new health food, is it necessary to make it look like beef? If soy-derived botanical nutty foods are competitive, then it is not necessary to be conscious of beef. In other words, in the sense of a replica of beef, that sloppy has lost it before it fights. I felt so...　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　

Today’s post is 30 minutes earlier than usual. I try to post at a fixed time as much as possible, but relatively weak posts move the time back and forth to cope with various other irregular situations. Things are dominated by power relations. For example, if you were asked to choose one of food, clothes or residence, which would you choose? Because you are a living being, you will nominate food. Equally, things that are relatively unimportant to important things are moved to the grass that flows through the river. Is not it the rule of the world?

According to a review considered neutral

The news I’m interested in lately is that “Beyond Meat”, but do you all know? It seems that meat is made from soybeans. I have never eaten it. According to a review considered neutral, if a person who does not know the presence of meat made from soy eats Beyond Meat, he seems to have the impression of “weird meat.” It seems to be so similar to real meat.
Well, the benefits of Beyond Meat: This food is 100% plant-based, so no malicious cholesterol is left in the body. I would like everyone to investigate the details, but in short, it seems to be a new food that leaves only the texture of the beef and removes the disadvantages.
But I want you to think a little. If it is such a wonderful new health food, is it necessary to make it look like beef? If soy-derived botanical nutty foods are competitive, then it is not necessary to be conscious of beef. In other words, in the sense of a replica of beef, that sloppy has lost it before it fights. I felt so.

Electronic cigarettes are prone to analog cigarettes before they fight in the market

There are other similar phenomena. For example, electronic cigarettes. No smoke, no fire, yet a product that produces a certain physiological function. With that innovative product, the cool toy doesn’t have to look like a cigarette? Adult toys that are familiar with luxury jackets should be competitive with their own appeal. Rather, it should be good to say that it is not a cigarette. However, it borrows the name “cigarette” like "electronic cigarettes". Electronic cigarettes are prone to analog cigarettes before they fight in the market. I felt so.

Yes, I wanted to say that we should not be forgiven. Electronic cigarettes will result in increased sales of analog cigarettes. Beyond meat will also increase sales of tired American beef. Because, by eating “weird beef”, consumers rediscover beef. That’s too much. But no, so fakes have meaning. I posted quickly today. Did today’s message go beyond prejudice? goodbye

Comments

Post a Comment