"Is there a store manager over there? No? When are you and this store manager working? Well, no. Yesterday, a patrol came to us. So, they may go there today. To the store manager! "
When it comes to large organizations, it seems that corporate governance will not be thorough even at the end.
A nice decision can even transform into something else in the name of discretion during the on-site implementation phase.
In addition, any important decision may be absorbed into another decision over time and disappear.
Corporate governance may be fully functional only on the days when the supervisory team patrols the field.
For that reason, it is a patrol inspection day that is hated.
However, as long as the fox has a fox strategy, the raccoon dog also has its own way of fighting.
By circulating patrol information at the field level, we prepare for unexpected visits by foxes.
So don’t betray anyone.
Just think about it for a moment. Without inspections and audits, an organization could lose its integrated chain of command and become a weird group with no management policy.
Is it too late? Is that so.
As you know, each site has its own unique circumstances, and local methods are well established.
And while it is inevitable that the decisions made from the top, which are sent by fax, will be corrected realistically, isn’t there any danger?
That is, the self-check function in the field may not work.
A group without outside indications or attention will endlessly run away and will not reflect on themselves until the day of dismantling.
I think an external audit is needed to prevent that mistake in advance.
Of course, you don’t have to follow the advice of those who don’t know the business.
However, it is a wise raccoon dog that can be seen as an opportunity to self-check it.
Pinellas Park woman, 65, struck and killed crossing street… She was not walking a crosswalk. …
That’s all for today’s post. Thank you
Comments