Skip to main content

Theoretically it hasn’t collapsed. In other words, you are deceived

What did you say? Was the black tulip already developed? ....

“Tulips are black”

lie
inconsistent
explanation
theory
deceived
facts

Do you think this is a lie? Haha, this is not a lie.

If it is stated that “red tulips are black”, it is theoretically inconsistent.

That said, it’s still not a lie. Theoretical failure and lies are different.

The explanation that tulips are black makes me feel uncomfortable because I suspect that they are inconsistent with the facts.

But theoretically it hasn’t collapsed. The tulips are not said to be red.

Those who think things theoretically accept any opinion as long as there is no problem with theoretical consistency. Even if it’s a lie.

Even false explanations, if theoretically aligned, can, of course, not be true, but can persuade those who love theory.

In other words, you are deceived.

To prevent that, those who take pride in their theoretical thinking should themselves check the validity of the various beliefs rooted in themselves.

But that’s not easy. Theory addicts often have unfounded confidence that they themselves build a normal theory on the basis of a normal premise.

I have to say that the scammers who see it and work are smart in a sense.

What did you say? Was the black tulip already developed?

‘Trump Just Used Us and Our Fear’: One Woman’s Journey Out of QAnon - The New York Times
‘Trump Just Used Us and Our Fear’: One Woman’s Journey Out of QAnon - The New York Times… But one day while she was scrolling, something caught her eye. …

That’s all for today’s post. Thank you

Comments