By the way, who is “someone”?
The condition of the information that circulates between us is that anyone can understand it, regardless of whether we agree or disagree with it.
Also, information is distributed even if it is unacceptable to people, as long as some people can accept it.
Recently, anonymous information has been distributed mainly on the Internet, but it contains a lot of fake information.
I think it’s relative whether the information is fake or fact. The only difference between the two is whether the time spent on verification is long or short.
Doesn’t it feel like information that takes less time to verify is considered a fact and information that takes a tedious amount of time to verify tends to be dismissed as fake?
So, if a rather rough definition is forgiven, easy-to-understand information is a fact, and confusing information is a fake.
But the trouble is that clever fake is stretched or simplified and easy to understand, so we easily trust them. Because we can accept it without hassle.
Therefore, we should think of the facts and fake that are in a relative relationship as different from the original information.
In other words, let’s define as information the latest knowledge that is neutral and circulates between us, regardless of how easy it is to understand.
After all, don’t lie, and don’t trust lies. Only by doing so can you reduce the time it takes to verify what you have heard or read.
After all, you shouldn’t be swayed by “someone.”
Susan Sarandon ‘open’ to dating any vaccinated ‘man or woman’ - New York Daily News… “[I will only date] someone who’s been vaccinated for COVID,” …
That’s all for today’s post. Thank you
Comments