The ranking of a game has been announced. About 10 people participated in the game.
Is ranking the purpose of the game?
If the game is fun, there is nothing wrong with it. Everyone thinks so. However, one participant said:
By showing the ranking, everyone should be more active in the game.
Until a few days ago, the above opinions were in the minority, but it seems that someone misunderstood them as the majority.
There is a ranking first, and it never comes with a game. But it’s unlikely that the rankings will be completely removed from the game.
Well, I thought it wouldn’t be a bad idea to refer to the rankings as a reference.
My name is in a subordinate group.
Indicators of things are meaningless
unless they are acceptable to everyone.
Indicators that are approved only by some are not objective and at least cannot be useful information.
So are general indicators always useful and valuable references?
That’s wrong, isn’t it? Even the indicators are based on the demands of the times. Previously approved indicators are not always valid.
Don’t trust old indicators. Everyone knows this.
Someone who has a modest initiative for no reason says. People at the bottom of the ranking will be out of the game.
What? Was the ranking shown to adjust the number of participants in the game? That’s terrible.
In fact, one player was removed. A few minutes later, another participant disappeared.
I glanced at the ranking table. Even though I was making a fool of it.
The idea that games should be fun sways.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 vs Moto RAZR 5G: How do they compare? -… The RAZR 5G launched roughly a year ago, …
That’s all for today’s post. Thank you
Comments